https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28220

--- Comment #5 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #4)
> My feeling is we've been too loose on how we handle this.

This sentence tried to say that I think attributes should be treated the same
as  any other borrowers.* column. Specially those that have constraints
(unique, not repeatable, mandatory). We are being more strict about this in the
code, and it will start hurting people with bad data, so we shouldn't allow bad
data in.

This needs some bigger changes in the import workflow, that I mentioned I plan
to work on soon. So in the meantime, I would prefer to:
- Skip the patron with good error reporting, or
- At least skip the bad attributes BUT provide good reporting

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to