https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28491
--- Comment #2 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- I understand your point. If we change 001, we should change 003 as well. But note that we have a lot of discussion for years going on if we should change 001 at biblio level. As you mentioned, the 003 is created for a new auth record but not for an import. LOC: Whenever the number in field 001 is changed, agencies must assure that the MARC code in field 003 applies to the number found in the 001 field. I am all for changing 003 here as well. But could imagine that others would rather refrain from changing 001? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
