https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28057
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- Why aren't we going further here? IMO we should completely remove the code related to biblioitemnumber. This comment: 405 ## Here we go backwards again to create hash of biblioitemnumber to itemnumbers 406 ## this is important when we have analytic items which may be on another record It implies that we must use biblioitemnumber to be correct, but we actually should use biblionumber. Is this correct? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
