https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24476
David Cook <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #77 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #76) > See also bug 24988. But if a patron has no autorenewal, he should not even > have this choice. It would be useless and confusing. It could be confusing for patrons to view and update an autorenewal setting if no autorenewals are allowed, but I'm not sure that there is a simple reasonable alternative. On one hand, you could calculate the circulation rules to determine if a patron is allowed to have autorenewals. On the other hand, that wouldn't take into account their existing autorenewal checkouts *plus* it's possible to set autorenewals at checkout time. So determining if an item is autorenewable and whether a patron allows autorenewals seems to me like 2 completely separate things in the end. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
