https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29538
--- Comment #10 from John Fawcett <[email protected]> --- Manos. no, there was no discussion about removing UNIMARC. The discussion was about a more maintainable way of providing UNIMARC translations that keep in sync with the original template. With the then existing mechanism UNIMARC was no longer installing anyway for Italian and I submitted some fixes to realign the translated version with the baseline which meant that it was now installable again. (From this I gather that not many new installations were being done in Italian for UNIMARC, but not sure whether people didn't need it or they needed it but it wasn't working). The basic problem with the then existing approach is translations were in the code. Jonathan proposed an alternative approach which would mean all translations would be on pootle and there was only one version of the template in the code (so nothing in the code to get out of sync as had happened). I believe that is a good approach and gave my feedback on it. I don't know who was involved in the decision but I do know I was not the only person to be asked for feedback. Your question is related to the Italian version, but I believe the modification applies to all translated versions except English and French. I think the issue is not about the discussion that was done or with how many people it was done, but that not all the code changes needed were committed together. As Jonathan has said, there is however a workaround, since upgrades from previouos versions installed with UNIMARC are supported. John -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
