https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29676
--- Comment #2 from AspenCat Team <[email protected]> --- I was excited about the matching rule idea, so I tried it in the current version 21.05 (though probably would work with earlier records). I edited an existing record and added a 942$9 subfield with yes and a description of protect this record. Although I think any data would work. I exported the edited record, then deleted the 942$9 subfield (which would be how our vendor and migration records would appear). I then tested against two matching rules. One with just isbn as match point. The other with isbn as a match point, but made the 942$9 as required match point. The one with just isbn as match point matched. The one with the additional match point of 942$9 did not match. Therefore, I think this would work for protecting a bib record from overlay on migration records(though it wouldn't protect from overlay of z39.50 search). Thanks for the match point suggestion! For us, this would meet our needs without further development. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
