https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29420
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #25) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #23) > > > > I cannot PQA without a follow-up bug report and patch. > > Could you elaborate a bit? > > Do you mean a follow-up bug report that depends on this one? And in that bug > report one would replace C4::Auth::psgi_env with > C4::Context->is_psgi_or_plack() (or vice versa) and check that it doesn't > cause a regression in the multiple different calls to C4::Auth::safe_exit? Yes, we should use a single method for the same thing. Here you introduce is_psgi_or_plack then we should use it from where psgi_env and other similar checks exist. Either here or a separate bug report. `git grep "psgi.*ENV"` shows the different occurrences. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
