https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29403
--- Comment #30 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- OK.. I took a deeper look and my assumptions were correct.. so I applied the two patchsets and ran the tests again.. and for me.. they pass as expected?! Are you sure you had both this patchset and bug 29718 applied? It is a bit of a funky test... in smart-rules we actually grab the passed date, convert to a datetime, then convert to an iso string and drop the time component. In the test, we're just passing a DateTime object, so it'll include a time element and it'll contextually stringify using the datetime defaults (to ISO including Time - Hense the 'T'). What is happening in our DateUtils is that we try to match on preference format ('us' in this case which will fail) and then fallback to 'sql/iso'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
