https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29245
--- Comment #20 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #19) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #17) > > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #16) > > > I count myself as a non-progammer tester as well - I think you mean that > > > we > > > already break the rule for not hardcoding the template, but I think those > > > are bugs we should fix then. Hea shows that having your own OPAC template > > > is > > > not as rare as one would think. > > > > This is an architectural patch, not the popular kind, yes. And insisting > > that it should also fix such occurrences makes it even harder. Since the > > patch is about fixing parameters, I would be tempted to say that it is > > outside the scope too ;) > > > > Having a look now how to get this on track again. But if it takes too much > > time, I will abandon it. > > I didn't mean fixing them on this bug - just that I would consider it a bug > and that we should not add more hardcoded 'bootstraps'. No problem. I understand your point and was willing to revert a few occurrences too. But working further, I decided to refactor a little bit more. Add more tests and at some point my time was up ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
