https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30154
--- Comment #3 from Noémie Labine <[email protected]> --- Thanks to both of you. It indeed seems to be a normal behaviour as the second indicator is copied from the authority record. However, I understand the second indicator is not 'supposed' to be empty, but the library that submitted this problem to us seems to have quite a few Uniform title authories created without a second indicator. I assume that it isn't the only library where the Marc 21 standards are not fully respected or at least that sometimes an indicator can be forgotten. Therefore, this behavior still makes it hard to correct the indicator. I know the 'right' way to correct the mistake would be to add the indicator in the authority record before adding the 830 in the record... but I'm thinking about situations where the person cataloguing wants to do it 'quickly' or for any other reason they decide not to correct the autority record. Plus, now that I understand where this comes from, I can reecreate in any other field with the first or the second indicator. For exemple, in a 700 field with a person's name without a first indicator. I would really understand if we decide to not fix this as it is not a 'real' problem if Marc21 standards are respected, but I do think it would lack consistency if we consider that we can very well create the authority without completely respecting Marc21, since we can save it without putting an indicator in the first place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
