http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9108
--- Comment #8 from Paul Poulain <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #7) > Yes but I don't want to introduce any regression and I think my patch is > more flexible than your proposition. avoid introducing regression++, but my proposal would have resulted in replacing all code that can be replaced to be. And it will clean the code. I don't see why your patch is more flexible = my proposal is to go further with your patch, not changing it ! (if another QAer disagree, feel free to jump in) > Like this anyone is allowed to use the format he wants. the syspref has only 3 values, and this should not change. > In the same way, the patches still submitted in BZ but not pushed will not > be broken (if using one of the two formats). is there a case ? I'm still thinking my proposal should be implemented, to avoid piling code (I know there is a lot in Koha already, not a reason to continue...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
