https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26979
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #8) > Hmm, I think I actually prefer the consistency of bug 30695 to the > pluralisation this introduces personally.. > > Example > > Holds (0) > Holds (5) > > vs > > 0 Holds > 1 Hold > 2 Holds > > Whilst the latter which this introduces is nice enough, given we have the > bracketed approach elsewhere fairly consistently I currently prefer that for > wider consistency.. I also feel that works better with the (X/Y) approaches > (though the `([X] [Y])` block does make me wince a little) It would be interesting to have end-user's opinions on that. You certainly prefer "Holds (X)" because of your developer's brain :D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
