https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30799
--- Comment #8 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #3) > Good to see this one. > Just a dumb question: Would it be useful to allow for partial MARC record > updates too instead of replacing the complete MARC record? > Suppose I just want to add one new field somewhere, and not want to risk > overwriting the complete MARC record somehow with an older version or so? If we wanted to add a PATCH route, we need to think of it in terms of the MARC overlay rules. Not because it needs to use that particularly (it could) but because we need a way to express the possible behaviors as we did on that dev. In that case there's a form for setting rules, for a PATCH route we would either need to add some payload representing the same, or just pointing to some overlay rule. This would be really interesting, but certainly a bigger dev and another report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
