https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30904
--- Comment #8 from Janusz Kaczmarek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #7) > (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #3) > > To sum up—I would suggest considering the patch OK, but probably data > > definition introduced by you with the commit > > 8df3116760bdf1b889dc6f78e4605e231c4d7d6d requires correction as well. IMO, > > UNIQUE KEY `additional_contents_uniq` (`category`,`code`,`lang`) would be > > perfect. > > Which means you couldn't have 2 identical contents for different libraries? > Sounds wrong to me. Why not? In every case you have to create them separately, which means they would get a different additional_contents.code. The presence or absence of branchcode in unique key does not change anything here, IMHO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
