https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29282
Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe | |.com --- Comment #12 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #11) > (In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #10) > > Is there a reason to use the classes issues_field and renewals_field for the > > values when the other columns don't have the _field prefix? There doesn't > > seem to be a name clash in the file with issues and renewals. > > > > Otherwise everything looks good for QA. > > I think those classes already has associated styles, and this was just a way > to differentiate the view on this page I see a .renewals rule in staff-global.scss (though I'm struggling to find anything using the class in the templates right now) but I don't see any rules that would catch an 'issues' class. I think personally I'd like to see the consistency carried through and the _field dropped from the class names. Asking Owen for an opinion in case I've missed something obvious. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
