https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30822
--- Comment #17 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #10) > But maybe we need that part, for biblio deletions, what do you think? > > + if ( $record_type eq 'biblio' && ( @updated_biblionumbers || > @deleted_biblionumbers ) ) { > + my $indexer = Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer->new({ index => > $Koha::SearchEngine::BIBLIOS_INDEX }); > + if ( @deleted_biblionumbers ) { > + $indexer->index_records( \@deleted_biblionumbers, > "recordDelete", "biblioserver" ); > + } else { > + $indexer->index_records( \@updated_biblionumbers, > "specialUpdate", "biblioserver" ); > + } > + } I agree that for consistency, we should address that too. But we could say that this can be done on a new report. The title of this report is scoped to BatchCommitRecords. And we are talking BatchRevert here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
