https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31022
--- Comment #4 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #3) > I do however find it really weird still that you can define more than one > definition for the same response status on the endpoint... > > i.e. the internal 400 definitions for the validator software and then our > own one for our own errors. > > I would have expected our definition to take precedence over the internal > one and thus need it to be a superset of the built-in one. > > Interesting. Doesn't our definition just overload the default/internal one? It used to return a 500 because it wasn't considered a valid response in the spec, which I find correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
