https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28854
--- Comment #453 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- > > Why the switch from effective_itemtype() to itemtype()? > > So.. the change here is actually so we can have access to the Item object > lower down in the function.. the switch from finding the itemtype object > directly to using the Koha::Item level accessor method means we get back the > effective_itemtype object directly via the accessor. See > Koha::Item->itemtype ;P Thanks! I see now! I missed that subroutine when I was looking for it! > Huh.. this is a copy/paste from Koha::Object::store (Yes, I'd like to move > it into DBIC at some point, but didn't feel it was appropriate here).. the > `\W?` is there.. just after `for column` in the regex.. not sure I follow > your question here I'm afraid. I missed where the \W was by focusing only on the patch and not the surrounding code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
