https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31150
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #2) > Interesting.. I think we've since settled on _date to stay in line with the > also recent discussions around api field names as described here: > https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Coding_Guidelines_-_API#SWAGGER1.3.4: > _mapping > > We should update the db fields page you linked to link between the two > definitions and make sure they're consistent. We never decided either. Hence this bug report. See previous comment. If we move to "*_date", does it include datetime and timestamp, etc. It's not that trivial. And in my mind we decided on "_on", or at least I picked that because it had the more occurrences in the codebase. There is no record of a community decision (at least I didn't find one). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
