https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31458

--- Comment #3 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 139800
  -->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=139800&action=edit
Add _update_patron_restriction_fields

This still needs some work.. picking which of the two constructs for
ordering works and removing new lines from the debarredcomment field.

Do we even need the local debarredcomment field any more... and should
the debarred field just become a boolean.. or should we just drop the
fields from the borrowers table entirely and rely on relations.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to