https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28012
--- Comment #9 from Joonas Kylmälä <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #8) > As we have name - which is not a code in this case - we should not make > description mandatory. > > I just confirmed that you can save a numbering pattern in a production 20.11 > (package installation) without adding a description. Possibly due to DBMS > configuration (non-strict?). > > So there should be a lot of patterns out there without description already, > that would then throw an error on editing. > > Same fix as for bug 31297? I was thinking of just focusing here on the UI side since description is mandatory on the DB level. Is it okay for you if we focus on the whether description is mandatory on bug 3129? If so, and bug 3129 gets merged then this patch might have to be adjusted but until it is then I think there's no problem with this patch, if you agree can you change the status back to need sign-off? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
