https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29100
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off --- Comment #12 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #11) > I fully support having an TT based option besides items.content for these > notices. It's about time! But I am still a bit confused about this patch :( > > What information can I get from issue or issues? (which tables?) We'll > definitely need to document. As it has the title in your example, I assume > it's not just a line from the issues table, but more than that. > > https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/ > Notices_with_Template_Toolkit#Variables_available_in_each_notice > > Terminology: We really should be using checkout instead of issue. > > If we use checkout(s), will it be the same as the one available in other > notices? Yes, that is correct. It gives that notice access to the checkout object, which means the library can can then have much greater ability to customize the format of the notice than with items.content. The library gets access to the checkout, the bib and the item data ( among others ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
