https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31727

Kevin Carnes <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected]
                   |ity.org                     |
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #3 from Kevin Carnes <[email protected]> ---
Thank for catching these problems. I made the false assumption that the
database table was only for the first table of rules and I used the template
name instead of the database column name for unseen_renewals_allowed.

I've made an atomic update that removes these rules when there is no
suspension_chargeperiod rule (this is a rule that should be made when saving
the first table of rules). It also renames any remaining unseenrenewalsallowed
to unseen_renewals_allowed.

It would be helpful if somebody else could check this to make sure it's right.
It's possible that suspension_chargeperiod is not a accurate check or it might
be better to only delete them if the still have the default values. All
corrections are appreciated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to