http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8369

--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > Is there a reason we couldn't keep the foreign key constraint and use NULL
> > to mean all branches/all patron types/all item types? It seems a shame to
> > lose the database-enforced consistency.
> 
> Yes, it is not possible to have a primary key on branchcode, categorycode
> and itemtype if they can be NULL :-/

But perhaps I can use a multiple unique key column on them

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to