https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17015
--- Comment #322 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- Blou: > As I stated in comment 312 last month, we do not care much about performance > anymore. Jonathan: > See also comment #121 > [note, comment 121 is about performances] Is there actually a worry about performances? At the time of the benchmarks with the test data, checkins & checkouts & fines.pl was either a bit faster or much faster depending on which of the 3 operations. So there doesn't seem to be much of a risk of regression. Or was the worry something else? Still need to have someone else replicate on the current codebase *but only if there isn't other concerns.* Jonathan: > and #154. > [link: comment 154] Ok so next would be to hope for one or two people from QA to check if the fundamental idea of the patch is good enough. And how much of Comment 119 still stands. I can try to advertise it. Meanwhile (or worse case in the long run), having it here is great so other libraries can pick it and report bugs as we have seen :D I know it's frustrating. Though the situation looks like lack of QAing resources in the community rather than fad. And the large patches are suffering the most from the large QA queue. Just looking how much the recalls patches had to be brought up in meetings and emails discussion before they could be reviewed enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
