https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31123
--- Comment #21 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #17) > (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #16) > > Subfield `z` is often 'public note' and subfield `x` is often 'nonpublic > > note' for other fields.. I did wonder about supporting subfield `u` > > specifically for a 'uri' to allow for linking to more details or a content > > policy or some such. > > a, x an z certainly make sense. Not sure what is better: keep it simple or > make it a complete list. Both could be options. > > The 5xx vary a lot in the number of subfields, 500 for example has almost > none/just the basics: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd500.html Rebased. Suggestion: let's use a complete list? That way libraries can use whatever. Also maybe good in case of UNIMARC? Did a tiny rebase: conflict in .pref -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
