https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32191
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- Bug 30327 - Add biblionumber to ComponentSortField Added biblionumber option to ComponentSortField Is this needed? What is the added value of the detail part? I am not sure we are not adding confusion. For instance we have: Bug 30392 - Add deleteditems.deleted_on Without the "Added" part, which could mean it hasn't been added(?) Also: Bug 28269 - Add new system preference SearchWithISSNVariations vs Bug 30250 - Add new system preference ApplyFrameworkDefaults Added new system preference 'ApplyFrameworkDefaults' We are lacking consistency. My suggestion would be to: 1. Don't add a detail when there is only 1 thing to tell and it has already been said in the description 2. Don't add the past -ed, which is only useful when we are executing a script and want to provide feedback (here we only want to tell what it done, use infinitive everywhere then) 3. Use the detail page ($out) when there are several things. For instance: Bug 42424: New awesome feature Add new DB column table.column Add new system preference SysPref etc. Note that "Bug 32030 - Add an ERM module" could have a detail part. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
