https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16522
--- Comment #76 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- First of all - thanks Heather! Your 'stamp of approval' means a lot to us! (In reply to Heather from comment #73) > I deleted the > $w from the 773 and the child remained linked to the parent because Koha > then used the data in the 773 $t of the child record which retrieved the > data in the 245 $a of the parent record. It does this even with the syspref > "UseControlNumber" set to "Use" and "EasyAnalyticalRecords" set to "Don't > Show." > > Maybe it shouldn't do this, but I like it--I like the fact that there is a > fallback behavior when there is no Control Number (i.e. no $w) to use for > searching. We actually asked for it, because we have both cases getting imported from the union catalog, linked and unlinked. It's not perfect, but it's a nice fallback. > (And I will keep arguing that the "In:..." in the OPAC should be moved down > to be consistent with other displays, but more folks in the community like > it up near the title and author(s), then I'll probably start arguing to move > it up there in the staff client!) I'll take care of that in a follow-up now. > I think this is a GREAT development, not at all minor, and will be of > service to many libraries in getting to their users articles, chapters, > papers, songs...all those great things that analytic records are used for. +100 :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
