https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277
--- Comment #23 from Nick Clemens <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Frank Hansen from comment #22) > I would still like to comment on ind2=4. As for us, we treat them as local > subject headings only and they are not included in any thesaurus. Therefore, > I would prefer not to see any authority records for either 008/11=| (or > 008/11=n) in our catalog, even if the format allows it. Are you saying you won't import those records - or you want those records to be ignored when linking? The former sounds easy enough, the second seems it would require a syspref to not link those > I also want to comment on 040$f. According to the Swedish cataloguing > guidelines here ... > So I question about allowing to omit 040$f when 008/11=z. This sounds like a comment on cataloging standards, and maybe something that can be set in frameworks. But I don't think we need code for this? > What causes the most trouble for me is, as mentioned earlier, that non-6XX > fields are hardcoded to LCSH. This creates problems for libraries outside > the US, as we typically do not use LCSH names. I wish we could skip > thesaurus search for those fields. These patches do now skip searching thesaurus when linking non-subject fields -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
