https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33242
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #11) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #10) > > I was going to PQA until I saw bug 33029, which gives us more flexibility. > > Not sure we need both personally. > > Yes we looked at that. Kyle, Nick and I concluded that both go fine together. > See description too, saying this: > > Compare the 33029 approach > [% KohaDates.datetime_from_string(checkout.issuedate).add( days => 3) | > $KohaDates %] > with the approch of this report > [% checkout.issuedate | $KohaDates add_days => 3 %] > > The latter notation is definitely shorter and prettier in my use case and > does only need a few lines more. Yes, more code to maintain, and the parsing here looks hacky to me, for less flexibility. Note that I didn't FQA but I am not the one who is going to PQA this ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
