http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9322
--- Comment #13 from Galen Charlton <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > I don't personally like either of these approaches - I think only the > transfer being completed should be completed - if it's for a reserve, it > should only cancel the reserve transfer. > > I was thinking maybe stash the reserve number in the comment or create a new > field for "what kind of transfer it is (reserve, with a number, or > branchtransfer, with branchtransfer.)" I think adding the reserve number to the transfer record would be useful, although I prefer doing it as a real, nullable foreign key rather than sticking it in the comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
