https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30725

Fridolin Somers <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
             Status|Failed QA                   |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Fridolin Somers <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5)
> I was using "record" as a generic term, not related to bibliographic records.
> If you really want to adjust it, then you should fix BatchUpdateItem as well.

Fair point.
Even "item" can be considered as a generic term for an object in a list.

It works, we should not touch it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to