https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30931
Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #23 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Alex Buckley from comment #0) > This bug report is for the community to decide which of the following is > desired for handling of the dateaccessioned field in the item editor: > > 1. A hint - To tell users if they leave the items.dateaccessioned field > (which is typically linked to the 952$d subfield) empty when adding a new > item in serials, cataloguing, or acquisitions then Koha will automatically > save the current date in that field. > > OR > > 2. Context-aware behaviour - Koha only pre-fills the item editor > dateaccessioned field with the current date when the item is added/new. > > Shifting this discussion away from bug 29963 so the community can proceed to > upstream the reversion of bug 29815 As I understand, the first patch is meant to revert 29815 but why doesnt it revert the plugin then? cataloguing/value_builder/dateaccessioned.pl Changing status. Please explain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
