https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33134
--- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #5) > OK, I'm just speculating: Is somewhere a place where you could find the > names of the ancient languages in the language itself? What would be the > point for this? > > I think the serious major problem now, with ES and the language facet, is > that in a humanistic library the user is presented with meaningless code > entries in the facet instead of language names, at least in English. > > Do we really need the language name in the language itself? for what > purpose? It is nice if it is present in the advanced search but if it is > not--like classic Syriac for syc or classis Greek including koine for grc or > other exotic languages we hold in our libraries--it is not a big problem. > At least much less important than syc and grc etc. as elements of the > language facet, IMVHO. > > Any idea how to solve this and move it forward so that this issue would not > remain frozen for next months or years? That's why I wrote this: I think we should try and add _as many as possible_ of these as well. I am aware that for some it makes no sense. I believe we are also missing some more common ones. I'll think on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
