https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22440
--- Comment #25 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #24) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #23) > > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #22) > > > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #19) > > > > Hm, I am not so happy about the FK change hidden/sneaked in with this > > > > bug. > > > > Especially since it's now without documentation/warning to users and can > > > > create data loss. > > > > > > > > If you don't store all information also in ILL request attributes it > > > > will be > > > > hard to determine what has been ordered for making acq decisions and > > > > creating reports. > > > > > > > > Also: there already was as specific bug for this change, stuck in > > > > discussion > > > > for these reasons: bug 21983 > > > > > > I'd have loved to at least get a comment/reaction. The fix mentioned seems > > > to be to enforce the change I marked as critical. > > > > Also, if you really want to do this, because it needs to be done: what's > > with the old ill_requests? It caused bug 33873. > > Should we do the same we did for orderlines? A database table has the option to use COALESCE, so that might be an option. We could also then shift the existing data. I am not sure what the technical requirement for the FK was, so can't tell if removing it again might be a valid option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
