https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #42 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- > We should imo not fail patches for occurrences of if( $a ) or test( 1 ), > since that was our style until this report.. "our" style? We didn't have any styles :D We simply need consistency. The QA check will WARN instead of FAIL to tell QA that it's not a strict failure. IMO we should fail (or adjust ourselves) for new blocks or new files. A couple of lines added to existing code should stick to the existing style. We can add or adjust options to perltidyrc, and discuss them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
