https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34200
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Phil Ringnalda from comment #4) > Gotta have every possible opinion on it ;) > > Being in a list is more like items: while merging bibs, we don't ask you > whether you want to move the items or throw them away, nor do we throw some > of them away without mentioning it, we just move them to the kept record. > > Or, like being in an acq order. I should clarify: a mechanism to select which lists to keep when merging records would be ideal. But in the absence of such a list, I'd rather see the final merged record kept in *all* lists that the pre-merged records were in. That seems more likely to be the desired outcome more often than simply keeping the lists from the main record. Further, in the cases where keeping all lists was not the desired outcome, it's relatively easy to correct. Re-adding a record to one or more lists from which it was silently dropped would be more difficult. In other words, I think there's a bug here, a merged record *should* be kept in all lists that previously contained the records that have been merged. And then there's room for an enhancement to make that behavior more flexible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
