https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34266
--- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- I think we need to make a decision here. The MARC21 and UNIMARC installations drifted apart with a re-configuration decision made at some point (I believe at Biblibre?). In MARC21 installations biblioitems.itemtype and items.itype are always mapped to itemtypes. I also believe that the MARC framework check checks for it. In UNIMARC the beahavior was altered. The standard frameworks even reflect this decision now, which is, I think, unfortunate. It creates a lot of issues and makes some features not work as intended for UNIMARC libraries: * Circulation rules for article requests on records without items are not configurable. * Hold max values for record level holds won't be checked correctly. * Item type search for records without items won't work. ... I personally believe Koha should not adapt to the UNIMARC change, but we should instead implement a separate document type column on record level if there is a good use case for it. And migrate the UNIMARC libraries to use it, freeing up the biblioitems.itemtype again. I believe this change works more accidentally than actually at the moment. For this patch: We DO want this behaviour with item-level itypes - it allows to save time when adding multiple items to a record. So the pref check as suggested does not work, it would need to check for a different mapping instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
