https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33847
--- Comment #13 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #11) > (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #10) > > (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #6) > > > We shouldn't be using our business classes on the DBRev, as they can > > > change > > > in the future and thus break this DBRev. > > > > I'm reading this as using DBIC directly is ok. Is that correct? > > I agree that we shouldn't be using business classes in the DBRev. > > I think that DBIC directly should be OK so long as only core functionality > is used. (A number of DBIC classes like Suggestion.pm, Itemtype.pm, > ErmAgreement.pm, et cetera have additional code added after "DO NOT MODIFY > THIS OR ANYTHING ABOVE", which is added logic and not drawn directly from > the database.) There will always be risks using the generated model as well. Let's stick to plain SQL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
