http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7180
--- Comment #24 from mathieu saby <[email protected]> --- We tested with other values in syspref (using subfields of unimarc 920 field). We changed our default framework to make visible subfields of 920, so we were able to check in MARC view. In syspref we had : - 920c mapped to sort1. In Koha, for our budget, sort1 was mapped with LOC authorized values. - 920d mapped to sort2. In Koha, for our budget, sort2 was free In our record, we put : - in 920c a value present in LOC. - in 920d a free value, (tested with and without an accent) Both 920c and 920d were imported in DB as sort1 and sort2. We tested with AND without using a matching rule (by ISBN) when staging record, and verything is correct : il the imported record match a record already in Koha, the existing record is used for order, and the values of 920 are used to fill the order. P. Angot & M. Saby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
