https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12532
--- Comment #120 from Hammat wele <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #116) > Sorry, I also meant to say I think the guarantor email should go in the cc > field rather than to field (unless the to field is empty in which case just > put guarantor in to). This complicates things a little but I feel it's the > right behaviour (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #118) > I agree Marcel.. It was late last night. > > So.. In short, I'd like some explanations from the original author as to why > they picked the changes they did.. I still don't understand a number of them. > > I think hooking into _send_message_by_email in C4::Letters is starting to > feel like it might be the right place... but setting a `cc` rather than > additional `to` Hi martin, The main goal here was to send email to both the guarantor and the guarantee either we use the to or cc field. But I agree with you, we should use the cc field to send the message to the garantors instead adding garantor addresses to the to field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
