https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26472
Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #42 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- > Restesting, this is what I get, and rereading, this is what is expected with > quaternary - it considers differences at the 4th level, meaning accents and > punctuation are both considered oops so the patch doesn't match the specs/test plan. So "strength: quaternary" is still better than "alternate: shifted", right? And better than the current sorting. Not sure there is another low cost alternative from all the previous comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
