https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34032
--- Comment #5 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- $hold->set( { priority => 1, found => undef, waitingdate => undef, expirationdate => $hold->patron_expiration_date, itemnumber => $hold->item_level_hold ? $hold->itemnumber : undef, } )->store({ hold_reverted => 1 }); Currently, only this case triggers part of the condition (that could be simplified to reduce repetition) that leads to calling: $self->_set_default_expirationdate; (Unless both dates are still the same..) If they are not, why not respect patron_expiration_date? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
