https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26314
--- Comment #39 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- > > Note to self, do we still need to 008 and other check we have in the XSLT > here after the penultimate patch? The POD in this patch is not completely right as it only talks about 773, we could correct that, but I am not sure if it's worth changing up things now. There are two ways to express a Set > volumes relationship: Case 1: 773 Set: 001 xxx 003 DE-627 Volume with dependent title: 773 _a volume title _w xxx Set: 001 1020782544 003 DE-627 Case 2: 8xx/449 pairs Volume with independent title: 830 0 _a Advances in analysis and geometry ; _v Volume 5 _w 1020782544 _x 2511-0438 And actually Michaela tested the second case. So we know it works with both cases, with and without the (003) prefix $w. (I verified) The problem I see is the rcn index is broad. It indexes all $w subfields from various linking fields. That's why the link includes NOT (bib-level:a OR bib-level:b) - so we can differentiate between analytical records and monographic ones. ... and that's why I thikn we better keep the checks on 008 and LDR. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
