https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32980
--- Comment #18 from Julian Maurice <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #17) > I think we gain consistency - if we always use builder, then it makes it > easy to see how to write tests. It is also safer for naming, to avoid > collision with possible test data in the system generated by humans (CCCCCCC > is something we could add for testing, and suddenly your tests are failing) > If there are fields you expect to be empty when building, we have sub > _gen_default_values and should add more cases as needed 'CCCC...' is a pattern for String::Random, so the risk of collision is minimal (and the same as with TestBuilder I think ?). I agree with the consistency point, but I really don't like that TestBuilder is populating columns I don't want to populate. I'll see if I can make this behaviour configurable (in another bug report) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
