https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34988
Emily Lamancusa <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emily.lamancusa@montgomeryc | |ountymd.gov --- Comment #1 from Emily Lamancusa <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #0) > From 23059: > > "One thing that would be nice to see as a follow-up would be the ability for > libraries that have in-processing and in-transit statuses to be able to > separate those out from "Placed". But that requires extra processing to > determine whether those statuses are relevant to the library, so it's a bit > out of scope for this bug, and doesn't need to block the alignment of the > report with the universally-relevant hold statuses." > > How do we define those 'universally-relevant hold statuses' exactly? I was just trying to say that "in-transit" and "in-processing" would be a nice follow up, but don't need to be a blocker on 23059. The four statuses your patch includes (Cancelled, Filled, Waiting, and Placed) are applicable to all libraries that use holds, and are a major improvement on what was there before, so I felt that patch should go forward as-is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
