https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15504
--- Comment #190 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andrii Nugged from comment #187) > btw, that atomic update quoting is very inconsistent: It's just between 1st and 3rd case. The 2nd uses interpolation so needs the double-q IIUC Is there even a recommendation for a default choice for the others? The examples at https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Database_updates#How_to_write_an_atomicupdate_file use q{ so let's use that. updatedatabase tested. ---- > I did the rebase. But which status we should put for the ticket? Thanks for the rebase :) It was passed QA before. So passed QA, unless the rebase showed that other changes could interfere with this and require retesting. **How was it?** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
