https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35095
--- Comment #14 from Caroline Cyr La Rose <[email protected]> --- I'm in favour of mapping all the fields to the marc record but I understand that it is not ideal from the code standpoint. I just think it's a shame that staff would enter all this information in this form and not have it anywhere else than in the ERM module. If they want to have it also in the catalog, they would have to enter it twice. Could we maybe flip it around and enter the information in a cataloging framework and map that to the kbart form? I want to mention however that I have never managed electronic resources in any ILS when I worked in a library and so far none of our clients have this (we update them only on .05.04 or .05.05, they will be getting 23.05.05 later this fall) so I don't really have any "real world" use experience... Please take my comments with a grain of salt... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
