https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35310
--- Comment #23 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Pedro Amorim from comment #22) > There may be some other things worth improving here, personally I don't > think the string "«Note: 1 out of 2 renewals have been logged»" is a clear > enough way of conveying to the staff user what is happening or has happened, > i.e. a person who does not know the history behind these datatabase tables > will likely not fully understand what that string is referring to (in my > opinion anyway, I didn't and was thrown off by it, but that's me!). But I > also don't have a better suggestion right now! Maybe «Note: 1 out of 2 renewals have been logged (old versions of Koha didn't log the date)» Or «Old versions of Koha didn't keep renewals dates, so only 1 out of 2 renewals have them.» > (In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #21) > > I see, because the old data isn't migrated due to missing date, it's left > > here and all places might need to account for two sources of renewals. > > This is not my understanding of the situation, but I may be wrong. > My understanding is that old data was not migrated due to missing datA, not > date. > Before the checkout_renewals table, renewals information just wasn't logged > individually. I recall from the patron checkout history that the old checkouts still have the number of renewals. (View => 1 out of 2 renewals [...]) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
