https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34900
--- Comment #17 from David Nind <[email protected]> --- I probably got a bit carried away with the follow-up - possibly outside the scope of the bug? Happy to put in a separate bug! License names: I used the full name and made consistent (for example: MIT License, instead of MIT or MIT license; GNU General Public License vX, instead of GPL or General public license). I did think about using abbreviations used at https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/licensing-a-repository or https://opensource.org/licenses/ Hopefully this helps a bit with translation. Questions for other bugs, if required: - Should the version of a piece of software be shown? A few do. - Should we have a short description of what they do, where they are used in Koha? - Should we change to a bullet list? - Versions of libraries: many seem quite old or not updated for a while. . Should I create an omnibus bug to update? . Should we update all libraries used at the start of a cycle? (The biggies, such as Bootstrap and jQuery, might be more problematic.) . Or do we have a "if it isn't broken, don't fix it" approach, unless there are security updates? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
